Submit your manuscript via the online submission and review system, eJournalPress, at
The science editor has sole responsibility for the decision to accept or reject a manuscript, and that decision is final. The editor and the editorial team discuss the reviewer reports, and decide whether the manuscript or a revised version of it could be published in the journal. Decision sent to author->Waiting for revision . Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. Should I thank the editor and reviewers for accepting my paper? So far I have not received any email which tells rejection. The decision is sent to the author. Also you have to assume people have been off for the holiday. Authors should use the formatting guide section to ensure that the level, length and format (particularly the layout of figures and tables and any Supplementary Information) conforms with Nature's requirements, at submission and each revision stage. 4a. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? If the scale of revisions means that the authors would need a long period of time and the manuscript would need extensive reworking, it may be suitable to reject the manuscript but invite the authors to resubmit. If an author remains unsatisfied, he or she can write to the Editor, citing the manuscript reference number. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? Journal-integrated preprint sharing from Springer Nature and Research Square. We recommend that before you decide your next steps you take a few days to consider you options. Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. Nature - For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. Next Steps To avoid such conflicts of interest, Nature requires potential referees to disclose any professional and commercial competing interests before undertaking to review a paper, and requires referees not to copy papers or to circulate them to un-named colleagues. . GSA Bulletin: gsab@geosociety.org
[CDATA[// >What does the status of my submission mean in Editorial Manager? - Elsevier All Rights Reserved. Critical review determines the suitability and originality of the paper and the adequacy and conciseness of the presentation. In all these cases, it is likely that some time will elapse before Nature can respond, and the paper must not be submitted for publication elsewhere during this time. The editor contacts the author with the decision. After providing a brief account of the nature of agency-based reasons, we argue that there is good reason to think that these reasons apply to at least chimpanzees. If the editors of Nature Plants decline publication of a manuscript, before or after peer review, the authors can easily transfer their manuscript to a different journal within the Nature Portfolio family by following the link provided in the editors decision email. Such figures can be particularly helpful to nonspecialist readers of cell, molecular and structural biology papers. Internet Explorer). Authors are provided with an encrypted link to this system after their paper has been accepted. Editorial criteria and processes | Nature So far I have not received any email which tells rejection. But on the status, "decision sent to author" and "decision sent to reviewers" are listed together. Editorial Process | Oncogene - Nature on 25 Jun, 2021, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Authors submitting to Nature do so on the understanding that they agree to these policies. How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and This service is available to authors at the time of decision or at a later time. Does "Decision Sent to Author " before the peer review stage - Reddit In this case, it is important to notify the editors that you are withdrawing your manuscript, and get confirmation that this it has been withdrawn, before you submit it to a different journal. Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. Note that in both comments (agreeing and disagreeing) the author is polite and shows respect for the reviewers opinion. 10. Note: Upon acceptance, authors are encouraged to send a short description of the paper and its significance, for release to the media. When submitting a revised manuscript, the author follows the same submission steps and the revised paper again goes through an initial quality check. At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. Special attention is paid by the editors to the readability of submitted material. On occasion, particularly if the editors feel that additional technical expertise is needed to make a decision, they may obtain advice from additional reviewers. The journal decision-making process is indeed a long and complex one and the authors are not always clear about each step in the process. Before publication, the Journals and Editorial press office also informs the press / public information officers of authors' institutions to allow them to prepare their own publicity. Editorial Process & Peer Review | Nature Plants When should you challenge an editors decision to reject a paper? Revised papers should be accompanied by a point-by-point response to all the comments made by all the referees. Technical reasons for rejection include: These rejection reasons can be avoided by investing enough time in reading around the subject area, carefully deciding on the topic to focus on, the hypothesis and planning a comprehensive experiment as outlined in the Springer Nature Journal Tutorial: Writing a Journal Manuscript. //--> All manuscripts are handled electronically throughout the consideration process. The science editor has sole responsibility for the decision to accept or reject a manuscript, and that decision is final. However, when they communicated their decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC), who makes the final decision, it was decided to reconsider your manuscript. availability to assess the manuscript within the requested time. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. In cases where authors opt in to publication of peer reviewer comments and reviewers opt in to being named, we will not link a reviewers name to their report unless they choose to sign their comments to the author with their name. It just says editor assigned and manuscript under consideration. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. So, in October 2018, we added a new . Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. //-->How do Editors reject an Editorial Manager submission and - Elsevier :-). Scan this QR code to download the app now. It stated 'Under consideration' until today, when it changed to 'Decision made,' and then back to 'Under consideration.' Our subeditors send authors the edited text for approval before it is typeset. A desk rejection, particularly at a journal like nature where there are a lot of submission, can definitely take more than a week. *Please note that using these tools, or any other service, is not a requirement for publication, nor does it imply or guarantee that editors will accept the article, or even select it for peer review. [CDATA[> Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Motivation: The total time it took for the manuscript to be rejected without being sent for review was too long, in our opinion (1 month). How to submit a manuscript Common Rejection Reasons | Authors Hence, Nature prefers to stick with the original referees of a particular paper rather than to call in new referees to arbitrate, unless there is some specific way in which the referee can be shown to be technically lacking or biased in judgement. Of course a desk reject can happen anytime but I was wondering if anyone had insight especially when submitting to Nature. Editors also strongly encourage authors in appropriate disciplines to include a simple schematic summarizing the main conclusion of the paper, which can be published with the paper as Supplementary Information. Under these circumstances, revised papers are not usually sent back to the referees because further technical work has not been required, but are accepted for publication once the editors have checked that the referees suggestions have been implemented and the paper is in the required format (the. Some authors ask the editors to reconsider a rejection decision. Cookie Notice The editor responsible for the final decision has the discretion however to weight individual reviewer comments as appropriate based on the expertise of each reviewer in the relevant areas and the reviewers . Answer: Decision in process status comes into the picture when the final decision is taken by the chief editor/editor in chief. If the decision is not to send the manuscript for assessment, the Editor in Chief contacts the author with the decision. For more information, please see our [CDATA[// >